Category Archives: exposition

a post aimed to teach something

Reducts and Reed-Muller codes

While I was in Adelaide, supposedly on holiday, Csaba Szabó sent me a preprint of a paper he had written with his student Bertalan Bodor. I read it with interest, and was able to make a small remark on the … Continue reading

Posted in exposition | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Generational equivalence

If you are interested in generating sets for finite groups, you may want to read this. I started this work with Colva Roney-Dougal some time ago, and I talked about it in Budapest last summer. Andrea Lucchini was in the … Continue reading

Posted in exposition | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Perth, week 1

The first week of the visit is over. The weather has been quite cold, but it is likely to improve as time goes on. The best day so far was yesterday, when we went to Yanchep National Park and had … Continue reading

Posted in doing mathematics, exposition | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Arrays

This post is about things called triple arrays, and some variants. I was visited by Tomas Nilson last semester, and we have just posted a paper on the arXiv. This is a subject with a quite extraordinary history; Rosemary will … Continue reading

Posted in exposition | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pappus and Diophantus

This post is inspired by a nice article by Adrian Rice and Ezra Brown in the latest BSHM Bulletin, titled “Commutativity and collinearity: a historical case study of the interconnection of mathematical ideas, Part II”. Pappus’ Theorem states that, if … Continue reading

Posted in exposition, history | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Conventions

I woke this morning thinking about something I learned in physics at school. A wire carrying a current in a magnetic field is acted on by a force (if it is not parallel to the field): in what direction does … Continue reading

Posted in exposition | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

There is no McLaughlin geometry

Congratulations to Patric Östergård and Leonard Soicher, who have just completed a big computation whose conclusion is “There is no McLaughlin geometry”. The run-time of the computation was about 250 core-years. So what did they compute, and why does it … Continue reading

Posted in exposition | Tagged , , | 1 Comment