If you like Latin squares and such things, take a look at Diamond Geezer’s post for today: a pair of orthogonal Latin squares with two disjoint common transversals, and some entries given (if you do the harder puzzle).

### Top Posts

### Recent comments

- Tendai Shumba on The Frattini argument
- Peter Cameron on The Frattini argument
- Tendai Shumba on The Frattini argument
- Peter Cameron on The Frattini argument
- Tendai Shumba on The Frattini argument

### Blogroll

- Alexander Konovalov
- Annoying precision
- Astronomy Picture of the Day
- Azimuth
- Bad science
- Bob Walters
- British Combinatorial Committee
- CIRCA tweets digest
- CoDiMa
- Coffee, love, and matrix algebra
- Comfortably numbered
- Computational semigroup theory
- DC's Improbable Science
- Diamond Geezer
- Exploring East London
- From hill to sea
- Gödel's lost letter and P=NP
- Gil Kalai
- Haris Aziz
- Intersections
- Jane's London
- Jon Awbrey
- Kourovka Notebook
- LMS blogs page
- Log24
- London Algebra Colloquium
- London Reconnections
- Marie Cameron's blog
- MathBlogging
- Micromath
- Neill Cameron
- neverendingbooks
- Noncommutative geometry
- numericana hall of fame
- Paul Goldberg
- Ratio bound
- Robert A. Wilson's blog
- Sheila's blog
- Since it is not …
- Spitalfields life
- St Albans midweek lunch
- Stubborn mule
- Sylvy's mathsy blog
- SymOmega
- Tangential thoughts
- Terry Tao
- The Aperiodical
- The De Morgan Journal
- The ICA
- The London column
- The Lumber Room
- The matroid union
- Theorem of the day
- Tim Gowers
- Vynmath
- XKCD

### Find me on the web

### Cameron Counts: RSS feeds

### Meta

I assume that the “harder” puzzle is aimed at non-mathematicians, as presumably any mathematician will just apply the group S_3 x S_3 to the symbols that aren’t J and D to get an appropriate Latin square.

From feedback on the site, it seems most people failed to realise that the second puzzle was a trivial transformation of the first.

Indeed – see David Craven’s comment (he’s a mathematician!)

You may be interested in my post of today.

Pingback: Geezer Puzzle « Log24