<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Galois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/galois/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/galois/</link>
	<description>always busy counting, doubting every figured guess . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cameron</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/galois/#comment-3921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cameron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1859#comment-3921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an evaluation of Galois as a &quot;g&#233;om&#232;tre r&#233;volutionnaire&quot;, and in particular his treatment of groups, by Peter Neumann in the current European Mathematical Society Newsletter. In particular, Neumann concludes that &quot;Galois discovered or invented groups for himself; With the possible exception of Ruffini in 1799 ... no mathematician had published anything like them before.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an evaluation of Galois as a &#8220;g&eacute;om&egrave;tre r&eacute;volutionnaire&#8221;, and in particular his treatment of groups, by Peter Neumann in the current European Mathematical Society Newsletter. In particular, Neumann concludes that &#8220;Galois discovered or invented groups for himself; With the possible exception of Ruffini in 1799 &#8230; no mathematician had published anything like them before.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Picks &#171; Mathblogging.org &#8212; the Blog</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/galois/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekly Picks &#171; Mathblogging.org &#8212; the Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 01:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1859#comment-3237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Galois&#8217;s 200th Birthday was celebrated at Peter Cameron&#8217;s Blog and Mathlog (who also celebrated Chern&#8217;s 100th [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Galois&#8217;s 200th Birthday was celebrated at Peter Cameron&#8217;s Blog and Mathlog (who also celebrated Chern&#8217;s 100th [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
