<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kirkman&#8217;s schoolgirls and their friends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/</link>
	<description>always busy counting, doubting every figured guess . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Futamarka</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/#comment-10695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Futamarka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-10695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Он сбежал из дворца, и от женщин, и от богатств, и от роскоши, от всего... Поэтому я не против Зорбы-Грека, потому что Зорба-Грек — это сама основа Зорбы-Будды. Будда вырастает из этого опыта. Я целиком за этот мир, потому что я знаю, что другой мир может быть почувствован только через этот. Поэтому я не говорю, что его следует избегать, я не скажу вам: станьте монахом. Монах — это тот, кто пошел против Зорбы, он беглец, трус; он сделал что-то в спешке, неразумно. Он незрелый человек. Монах — неспелый, жадный — жаждущий иного мира, и хочет его слишком рано, а время еще не пришло, монах еще не созрел.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Он сбежал из дворца, и от женщин, и от богатств, и от роскоши, от всего&#8230; Поэтому я не против Зорбы-Грека, потому что Зорба-Грек — это сама основа Зорбы-Будды. Будда вырастает из этого опыта. Я целиком за этот мир, потому что я знаю, что другой мир может быть почувствован только через этот. Поэтому я не говорю, что его следует избегать, я не скажу вам: станьте монахом. Монах — это тот, кто пошел против Зорбы, он беглец, трус; он сделал что-то в спешке, неразумно. Он незрелый человек. Монах — неспелый, жадный — жаждущий иного мира, и хочет его слишком рано, а время еще не пришло, монах еще не созрел.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Wakeling</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/#comment-4598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Wakeling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-4598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a solution to the (16,4) problem here:

http://www.devenezia.com/round-robin/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1312720662

I found it by testing all possible partitions of the 35 resolution classes of the 3-design.  There are other partitions of the same design possible, but only the one shown can be described so simply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a solution to the (16,4) problem here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.devenezia.com/round-robin/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1312720662" rel="nofollow">http://www.devenezia.com/round-robin/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1312720662</a></p>
<p>I found it by testing all possible partitions of the 35 resolution classes of the 3-design.  There are other partitions of the same design possible, but only the one shown can be described so simply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Steyer</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/#comment-3563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Steyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-3563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for the elegant solution and understandable explanation of factor 2-cover construction! This settles parts of a question that I posed myself 30 years ago when I designed soccer tournaments at high school. We were 8 boys and wanted to play a tournament with 4 teams each day so that each pair of players plays vs each other pair of players exactly once. I spent some classes with trying to find a design – of course in vain because there is no solution.

Many years later I rediscovered this problem, renamed it doubles tennis tournament design and found a solution for 10 players, first by something like brute force on a PC, later by design. I think that solution is not isomorphic to the one described here: I started with 8 players and designed 7 days by taking pairs of players from adjacent columns from the addition table of GF(8), adding (9,10) to each day. Then I left 10 at its place and permuted players 1-9 according to the rows of the addition table of GF(9). I wonder whether this is of any interest - in particular because this method seems to fail for n=18 – but I can provide details on request.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the elegant solution and understandable explanation of factor 2-cover construction! This settles parts of a question that I posed myself 30 years ago when I designed soccer tournaments at high school. We were 8 boys and wanted to play a tournament with 4 teams each day so that each pair of players plays vs each other pair of players exactly once. I spent some classes with trying to find a design – of course in vain because there is no solution.</p>
<p>Many years later I rediscovered this problem, renamed it doubles tennis tournament design and found a solution for 10 players, first by something like brute force on a PC, later by design. I think that solution is not isomorphic to the one described here: I started with 8 players and designed 7 days by taking pairs of players from adjacent columns from the addition table of GF(8), adding (9,10) to each day. Then I left 10 at its place and permuted players 1-9 according to the rows of the addition table of GF(9). I wonder whether this is of any interest &#8211; in particular because this method seems to fail for n=18 – but I can provide details on request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Hudson</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Hudson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-3514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this blog while searching for a construction of a solution to an analog for the (16,4) case of Sylvester&#039;s extension to Kirkman&#039;s schoolgirls.  That is, with 16 girls walking in groups of 4, they cam form different groups on each of the 5 weekdays.  Can they do that in each of 7 weeks, such that no three of them are contained within such a group of 4 more than once?

I can find an arrangement of 140 S(3,4,16) into 35 collections of 4, so each set of 4 is a S(1,4,16).  And of course the &quot;Kirkman&quot; problem, arranging the 20 elements of an S(2,4,16) into 5 partitions, each a S(1,4,16), is easily solved.

Has this problem been solved, or proven insoluble?  If not, do you have any insight that might help me find a solution?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this blog while searching for a construction of a solution to an analog for the (16,4) case of Sylvester&#8217;s extension to Kirkman&#8217;s schoolgirls.  That is, with 16 girls walking in groups of 4, they cam form different groups on each of the 5 weekdays.  Can they do that in each of 7 weeks, such that no three of them are contained within such a group of 4 more than once?</p>
<p>I can find an arrangement of 140 S(3,4,16) into 35 collections of 4, so each set of 4 is a S(1,4,16).  And of course the &#8220;Kirkman&#8221; problem, arranging the 20 elements of an S(2,4,16) into 5 partitions, each a S(1,4,16), is easily solved.</p>
<p>Has this problem been solved, or proven insoluble?  If not, do you have any insight that might help me find a solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Royle</title>
		<link>http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/kirkmans-schoolgirls-and-their-friends/#comment-2466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Royle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameroncounts.wordpress.com/?p=1354#comment-2466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know the answer to your question, but is it possible that one factor 2-cover could give rise to different projective planes, by choosing a different factorisation to in order to &quot;complete the plane&quot;.

It would be nice to be able to make some new projective planes - the number of known planes of order 16 has been stuck for quite a while, but I am not sure whether anyone believes it is complete.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know the answer to your question, but is it possible that one factor 2-cover could give rise to different projective planes, by choosing a different factorisation to in order to &#8220;complete the plane&#8221;.</p>
<p>It would be nice to be able to make some new projective planes &#8211; the number of known planes of order 16 has been stuck for quite a while, but I am not sure whether anyone believes it is complete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
