A meeting this morning organised by the department of the College responsible for teaching rooms. Not as well attended as it might have been, as it’s in the vacation and several colleagues are stuck in foreign parts by the ash cloud, but quite a lively discussion for all that.
The presenter gave us an overview of the perceived (by whom??) advantages and disadvantages of blackboards and whiteboards, and proceeded to give us very short demonstrations of various technological solutions including visualizers (document cameras), “electronic easels”, and a system called “Papershow” (I keep wanting to type “Paperchase”).
Inevitably the discussion got off onto the merits of the tech fixes first, but it was eventually brought back to the strengths and weaknesses of boards (where there was no general agreement about the perceived list).
I was able to put in a pet theory of mine. My handwriting on a blackboard is better than it is on a whiteboard. I think that this is in large part because of simple physics: there is a degree of “bite” [technical term in physics!] between the chalk and the board which matches that between pen and paper, whereas whiteboards are just too slippery. I think this could perhaps be fixed by producing whiteboards with a matt surface. This would also make them able to double up as projector screens. The possible downside is that matt boards might be harder to clean. (Cleaning is already a major problem with whiteboards.)
There was a defence of smartboards from a small group in the audience, even though these were not on the agenda. I think they are a poor substitute, because of the low resolution and the timelag between writing and response; but there is a more serious issue. With a projection system, the really big item is just a white screen; with a smartboard, it has to have electronics in it, and presumably the cost goes up steeply with the area.
Of the tech solutions, “Papershow” seemed the best: you write on paper and the result is projected in your choice of pen size and colour, no need for a range of pens. Unfortunately the paper design is patented and pads of this paper are very expensive.
I was gratified to learn that the College is listening to all shades of opinion, and has recognised that board area is one of the main issues.
On the other hand, I was disappointed to learn that overhead projectors now fall foul of health and safety legislation, and it is possible that blackboards will suffer the same fate. (The fact that chalk dust is more dangerous than organic solvent fumes seems to be an urban myth with a powerful grasp on many people, like sans serif fonts and dyslexia.)